data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3baa/a3baaf47ae01b519a9ef606b42a2a0ca5f583952" alt=""
There certainly are situations where it is not enough to stand on the sidelines with a self-satisfied, principled stance. But there's a problem that there isn't anymore space for a genuinely pro-peace position. And there are plenty of people, I think it's fair to say that in the last 10 years they've mostly not not exclusively been on the anti-Israel side, actively trying destroy whatever space remains. Though some of the pictures I've seen have been posted by the anti-Israel crowd, I haven't seen any anywhere that say things like "Pro-Israel, Pro-Palestine, Pro-Peace" or "Salaam, Shalom, Peace." Ten years ago, these were staples of such protests.
I think the most important consideration for peace activists has to be to recover that space. I don't think that can be done by joining these anti-Israel protests. Maybe standing ostentatiously in the middle of the street between the different protestors would be a good strategy.
1 comment:
Thank you for posting this. I also feel the same way - that the space inbetween has been diminished almost to nothing. If I were living in New York City, and felt inclined to demonstrate for peace between Israel and Palestine, I certainly would not join the demonstrations that I covered in my blog. I had to wonder how the woman wearing the "Jews Against the Occupation" shirt felt standing among those calling for the destruction of Israel or holding explicitly anti-semitic signs (like the one with the disgusting photograph of the dead person). I am both a "Jew against the occupation" and a a "Jew against anti-semitism" so I can't imagine feeling at all comfortable in such a setting. I have read some statements by pro-peace Israel groups that I agree with (for example Brit Tzedek) but they aren't very prominent in the public sphere of the discussion about Gaza.
Post a Comment